Introduction
In an age defined by expressive individualism, the right to self-define has become sacrosanct, even when such self-definition defies material, biological, and theological reality. Transgender ideology, which asserts that one’s gender identity may differ entirely from one’s biological sex, represents one of the most forceful expressions of this modern creed. Framed by the language of inclusion and care, it nonetheless demands public affirmation of private perception and often reacts with hostility when reality fails to cooperate. While appeals to trauma, marginalisation, and suicide prevention dominate public narratives, few have dared to ask whether such ideology may in fact be a cultural manifestation of narcissism, misandry, and even misogyny.
This essay contends that contemporary transgender ideology, particularly when it compels societal affirmation and dismantles sex-based realities—manifests characteristics of vulnerable narcissism and functions, paradoxically, as both misogynistic and misandrist. It argues for a theological reassertion of embodied identity, biblical honour between the sexes, and compassion without compromise. Drawing on interdisciplinary sources, psychology, theology, sociology, and feminist critique, it exposes the idolatry of self that undergirds gender ideology and calls for a rediscovery of the sacredness of sexual difference.
Narcissism and the Psychology of Identity
Narcissism, classically understood, is not mere vanity but a pathological self-focus that demands external validation and reacts defensively to contradiction. The DSM-5 defines Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) as involving a grandiose sense of self-importance, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy.¹ Yet a more insidious form, vulnerable narcissism, presents as hypersensitive, self-pitying, and fragile, seeking control not through dominance but through perceived victimhood.²
This is not incidental to transgender discourse. Vulnerable narcissists “may not feel superior, but they expect special treatment” and frequently interpret disagreement as attack.³ Such traits are often found in contexts where gender identity is elevated to a sacred status, immune to question. Studies show that narcissists often react with rage or depression when their self-concept is not affirmed, particularly when rooted in trauma or unstable attachment histories.⁴
Research supports this psychological framing. One study of transitioning adults revealed deep-seated emotional fragility, identity confusion, and unresolved personal trauma driving the transition process.⁵ Another analysis highlighted how gender-dysphoric individuals often navigate social affirmation with a hypersensitivity that mirrors clinical narcissism.⁶ These patterns suggest that the need for affirmation among some trans-identifying individuals may not stem purely from identity affirmation, but from narcissistic fragility.
This does not deny real psychological suffering. Many transgender individuals face isolation, bullying, and mental health challenges. Yet suffering and narcissism are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, narcissists often suffer deeply, particularly when their fragile self-image goes unvalidated.⁷
Transgenderism and the Culture of Self-Worship
Philosopher Charles Taylor has traced the modern elevation of the self from moral agent to identity-sovereign.⁸ Carl Trueman expands this critique by showing how the modern self emerged as a product of romantic individualism and psychological interiority, whereby feelings became the truest form of reality.⁹ Within this framework, the body is no longer sacred or indicative of truth, it is a canvas for the inner self to manipulate.
This view aligns with what Nancy Pearcey calls a return to Gnostic dualism, the ancient heresy that separates body from personhood. She states that, “The body is treated as irrelevant to personhood, a trivial part of our being that can be used or discarded at will.”¹⁰ Transgender ideology thus redefines identity as something disembodied, re-engineered, and unanchored from creation.
Such ideas are heavily influenced by Judith Butler, who argued that gender is performative and not tied to any essential nature.¹¹ Michel Foucault likewise suggested that all sexual identity is a product of discourse and power relations, not biological fact.¹² Together, their views have shaped a generation that believes subjective identity trumps objective design. Yet this raises profound questions: If gender is performative, why not perform performance grounded in biology? And if identity stems from discourse, why not from Biblical discourse, where embodiment and difference are declared “very good”? These queries expose the selective relativism of postmodern theory: it uncritically celebrates personal expression but scorns any rootedness in divine revelation or natural design.
This has theological consequences. Genesis 1:27 declares, “male and female He created them.” The rejection of this created order is not a neutral act of self-definition, it is rebellion against divine architecture. As Pearcey observes, “We are called to love our bodies because God does.”¹³
Misogyny Disguised as Liberation
While transgenderism is often marketed as progressive and liberating, its effects on women are deeply regressive. Feminist critics like Kathleen Stock and Mary Harrington argue that trans ideology erases women as a political and biological class.¹⁴ If anyone can be a woman, then being a woman means nothing. Misogyny, once overtly patriarchal, now appears in the guise of inclusion. It seems strange, then, that some aspire to imitate womanhood to seduce the patriarchy, and others to become its very symbol- masculine. In both cases, womanhood is not honoured but either stylised or surrendered, suggesting not progress but profound disorientation.
This is not mere rhetoric. The infiltration of male-bodied individuals into women’s sports, prisons, shelters, and changing rooms endangers the privacy, safety, and dignity of women.¹⁵ Women who protest these changes are often silenced, “de-platformed,” or vilified. Such erasure is not just social, it is ontological. It denies that women are a distinct reality, reducible to feelings or to costume.
Moreover, the “performance” of womanhood by trans-identifying males often relies on stereotypical, hyper-sexualised tropes, heels, makeup, submissiveness, thereby reinforcing the very caricatures feminism sought to dismantle.¹⁶ The result is a misogynistic parody of femininity, celebrated as liberation.
True philogyny, the love and honour of women, requires upholding the boundaries that protect their space, bodies, and language. Transgender ideology, by collapsing those boundaries, ironically becomes a vehicle for modern misogyny.
The Forgotten Male: Misandry in the Age of Identity Politics
If misogyny is veiled in feminine performance, misandry finds refuge in the cultural narrative that masculinity is inherently toxic. In transgender discourse, especially regarding female-to-male transitions, there is often a repudiation of femaleness and an idealisation of male power. At the same time, traditional masculinity is increasingly pathologised in schools, media, and academia.¹⁷ One cannot help but wonder whether male genitalia envy is a driving impulse behind this inversion. And if so, the cultural mockery that reduces men to sex-driven muscles poses a deeper contradiction: why would one aspire to be degraded into the very stereotype feminists once fought against?
Mary Harrington warns that the erasure of men is not a feminist victory but a social collapse.¹⁸ Boys raised to believe that manhood is oppressive will either shrink from it or distort it into caricature. Theological anthropology affirms that maleness, like femaleness, is created good. To erase or demonise it is to reject God’s image.
The rise in gender confusion among teenage girls, often desiring to become male, also suggests a cultural rejection of womanhood itself.¹⁹ Misandry and misogyny thus appear as twin forces in a world untethered from biblical honour between the sexes.
Identity, Suffering, and the False Gospel of Affirmation
One of the strongest cultural arguments for transgender affirmation is the claim of suffering. Trans-identifying individuals face high rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation.²⁰ This is real, and Christians should respond with compassion. But compassion must not be confused with capitulation.
The “gospel” of affirmation, that one’s inner identity must be affirmed by all, is not a biblical gospel. In fact, it contradicts Jesus’ call: “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself” (Matt. 16:24). The therapeutic culture says: “Affirm yourself.” Christ says: “Deny yourself.”
Studies have shown that affirmation alone does not resolve gender dysphoria.²¹ In some cases, transition worsens mental health outcomes, especially when underlying trauma goes unaddressed.²² To offer surgery instead of soul care is not love, it is negligence.
What we are witnessing is a form of cultural narcissism dressed in the dysphoric robes of social justice. As Christopher Lasch warned decades ago, the culture of narcissism seeks to replace virtue with validation and truth with therapy.²³
Conclusion
Only when we reclaim the honour of embodied sexual difference, rooted in creation and restored in Christ, can we begin to mend the fractures in our identity-starved, narcissism-addicted world.
And it is precisely here that the truth about the transgender narrative becomes clear. This ideology, though often cloaked in the language of compassion, is built on a series of falsehoods. It denies embodied reality, demanding that subjective feelings override objective form. It elevates the self to a sacred status, requiring uncritical affirmation and punishing even the gentlest dissent. It erases women in the name of inclusion and diminishes men under the guise of justice. It thrives on confusion, contradiction, and coercion, hallmarks not of truth, but of delusion.
The suffering of gender-dysphoric individuals is real, and our hearts must be soft toward every person made in the image of God. But the presence of pain does not prove the truth of an ideology. Narcissists suffer too, especially when their fragile self-image is not reflected back by others. Psychological distress does not validate false anthropology. The wounds are genuine, but the remedy cannot be lies.
Moreover, the transgender movement does not simply ask to coexist. It demands total conformity, linguistic, legal, moral, and theological. This is not the posture of the wounded, but of the imperial. If gender is truly fluid, why must society enshrine it in legislation? If it is private, why must it become public dogma? The ideology claims to dismantle categories, yet it fiercely polices new ones. It is incoherent. And all idols, when pushed to their limits, devour their worshippers.
Theologically, this is the ancient rebellion renewed: “I will make myself like the Most High” (Isaiah 14:14). The trans movement is not simply confused, it is sacralised selfism. It dethrones the Creator and enthrones the creature. It tells the clay to resent its form and sue the Potter. In doing so, it offers a false gospel: “Save yourself by becoming yourself.” But the true gospel speaks a better word: “Lose yourself, and you will be found.”
The Church, therefore, must not flinch. To love our neighbour does not mean to echo their delusions, it means to call them home. The body is not a prison; it is a parable of God’s intention. Christ did not become an idea, He became flesh. And He did not affirm us in our confusion, He died to redeem it.
So let the world rage.
Let truth be called hate.
But truth still speaks.
Not because truth is cruel, but because it knows that lies kill and only truth saves. “Male and female He created them.”
That is not violence, it is mercy.
It is design.
It is a gift.
And it is very good.
Bibliography
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5-TR. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2022.
2. Elsa F. Ronningstam. Identifying and Understanding the Narcissistic Personality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
3. Craig Malkin. Rethinking Narcissism: The Secret to Recognizing and Coping with Narcissists. New York: Harper Perennial, 2015.
4. Roy F. Baumeister. Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty. New York: Henry Holt, 1997.
5. Nichola Harrison, Lucy Jacobs, and Adrian Parke. “Understanding the Lived Experiences of Transitioning Adults with Gender Dysphoria.” Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling 14, no. 1 (2020): 38–55.
6. Courtney Stevenson. “Gender Dysphoria: A Qualitative Study.” Johnson & Wales University ScholarsArchive, 2021.
7. Jean M. Twenge and W. Keith Campbell. The Narcissism Epidemic. New York: Atria Books, 2009.
8. Charles Taylor. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
9. Carl R. Trueman. The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self. Wheaton: Crossway, 2020.
10. Nancy Pearcey. Love Thy Body: Answering Hard Questions about Life and Sexuality. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2018.
11. Judith Butler. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.
12. Michel Foucault. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. New York: Pantheon, 1978.
13. Pearcey, Love Thy Body.
14. Kathleen Stock. Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism. London: Fleet, 2021.
15. Mary Harrington. Feminism Against Progress. London: Forum, 2023.
16. Camille Paglia. Sexual Personae. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
17. Harrington, Feminism Against Progress.
18. Ibid.
19. Lisa Littman. “Parent Reports of Adolescents and Young Adults Perceived to Show Signs of a Rapid Onset of Gender Dysphoria.” PLOS ONE 13, no. 8 (2018): e0202330.
20. Peter Ehlinger et al. “A Qualitative Analysis of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming College Students’ Experiences.” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 36, no. 2 (2022): 197–208.
21. Rebecca Coleman-Smith and Dan Kilpatrick. “A Qualitative Study Exploring Gender Dysphoria in Adults with Autism.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 51 (2021): 3640–3653.
22. Paul R. McHugh. “Surgical Sex.” First Things, November 2004.
23. Christopher Lasch. The Culture of Narcissism. New York: W.W. Norton, 1979.
#Hayibo 